Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan yang Dilakukan oleh Karyawan PT. ACP dan APM

Abstract

The crime of embezzlement in office is commonly known as embezzlement with aggravation and is regulated in Article 374; the crime of embezzlement is a criminal offense related to moral or mental and a belief in one's honesty; this crime is punishable by a maximum imprisonment of five years as contained in Article 374 of the Criminal Code. The main objective of this research is to find out about the application of criminal sanctions against the crime of embezzlement in office and how the judge considers deciding on the crime of embezzlement in office. This research used empirical juridical methods with primary and secondary data types and sources, which were then compiled descriptively.From the results of research conducted by the author, the sentence given in the court decision in case Number 145/Pid.B/2023/PN Mrk is legally guilty by the elements in Article 374 of the Criminal Code, in the opinion of the author, the sentence given to the defendant is still not appropriate. The elements given to the defendant were where he looked back at how much loss the company had experienced and the impact of a lack of trust from the vendor (shop).